Boatmad.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 23-12-2009, 10:14 AM   #1
Trade Member
 
Country: United States
Location: South Texas. USA
Occupation: Own JSRE ( Jay Smith Racing Engines )
Interests: ACCELERATION (anykind )

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Texas. USA
Posts: 244
My take on 2 cycle oils

IMO about oils:

First there are many great oils out there ( some better than others and most of that conclusion is strickly opinionated from hear say and not acutal hands on visual comparisons ) 99.9 % of ALL outboard failures are NOT oil related. I tear down, modify and build 1 to 3 engines a week with the every brand of oil thats sold used in them and I have came to several very apparent conclusions about whats good, better and best ( like Sears Roebuck advertised )

I have through research ( and observed failures first hand NOT hear say stories) come to the conclusion that steel sleeved engines live better on a blend, no matter who's blend.. Pen, Mercury ( Golden Spectro ) , etc...And a syn oil can be used on steel IF the ring thrust tention has lessoned so that the ring is not applying to much outboard thrust pressure to the bore ( OR TOTALLY BROKE IN )

Coated sleeved engines run and make MORE power on 100% syn oils after break - in on dino ( about 100 gallons of gas ran thru with the dino oil ) ( the reason Mercury doesn't suggest the running of a 100% syn oils in the race engines is THEY DON'T SELL OR OFFER ONE !!!!!.)

Certain oils that are designed to be recreational in nature should be used in engines turning 8000 or less rpms and under less stress. Anything turning over 8000 for extended run life at BIG rpms should use a specific oil for the stress and load those engines create.

As I said there are many good oils out there but always be careful listening to the "oil experts" most of the time there is a hidden agenda , THEY SELL IT AND MAKE A LIVING WITH YOU FOLLOWING THEIR SUGGESTIONS that results in AN OIL SALES and $$$ in their pocket.. I on the other hand don't make a dime on a drop of oil sales.

There are IMO two oils I have seen ran and litterly peel the chrome off the journal of a Mercury V-6 crank.Other than those two Bad Actors I don't think there are any TCW3 approved oils that would blow up a motor due to lack of quality,under recreational loads syn and or dino in make up , most outboards engines have way more reasons and causes for failure than oil quality...I'd say 99 to 1. Quanity or lack there of of oil takes many more out that quality..

Most of the time availability and price on recreational 2 cycle engine oil sales will always turn me toward Penn., or Mercury as they are always available at Wally World or most larger auto and sporting good outlets. IMO to ship a big $$ over kill oil for a recreational engine from miles away and eat not only the over kill price of the oil but the freight in these economic times is a bit ..... well your call. BUT if your stressing a motor over the protection of the "norm" by all means buy an oil to protect your investment..

Happy Boating,
Jay
__________
__________________

Jay Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 02:49 PM   #2
numbskull
 
Jon Fuller's Avatar
 
Country: United Kingdom
Location: South
Occupation: none
Interests: none
Boat name: Leviathan
Boat make: Phantom 28
Cruising area: South Coast

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South
Posts: 15,959
Sounds like sound advice. I don't suppose you're likely to name the two particularly bad brands you speak of?

Would it be possible to 'give a clue' to their identity if you don't want to actually name them?

JF
__________________

__________________
.

"I Agree with everything you say really!" - John Cooke to Jon Fuller - 26-01-2013
Jon Fuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 03:22 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Bad Boy 717's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Somerset
Occupation: old bloke
Interests: Water Ski Racing, Basic Racing
Boat name: Bad Boy 717, Hotshot 777
Boat make: Phantom 21, Phantom 21
Engines: JSRE Merc 2.5 EFIss 280hp, Merc 2.5 x 2
Cruising area: Weymouth, Weston and rest of UK

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somerset
Posts: 529
better not be Castrol Bio Lube, I have a garage full of the stuff!
Bad Boy 717 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 05:49 PM   #4
Trade Member
 
Country: United States
Location: South Texas. USA
Occupation: Own JSRE ( Jay Smith Racing Engines )
Interests: ACCELERATION (anykind )

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Texas. USA
Posts: 244
You have P.M. Jon !

My intention is NOT to create an oil war on this site. As I stated I have NO hidden agenda by selling lubes. I don't sell oil period. All I can report is on what I SEE with my own eyes. I have said many time I could care less what oils people choose , the wrong choice pays my new Z06 corvette notes I have stated what oils brands many times earlier that I find to be adiquate to run engines and yield long longevitys per each engines needs... Can't go wrong with the Mercury oils ( Made by Golden Spectro ) the Pennzoil BLEND products on steel sleeved engines . These work great on recreational engines turning 8000 and less, if the motor is to be stressed I like Motol. Red Line, Alisyn BIO,Penn. 100 % syn. There is a popular oil that some are required to run in some US Drag racing clubs and I am told it will GUT a set of injectors. I have torn down a race engine that used this oil and find a gritty substance through out the complete engine and the Nicom bore are cloudy and looks like some one shot gray primer on them all... Some go QUEER because of what this oil smells like , it smells like $$$ going from the customer's wallet to me repairing these motors bores bearings and rings...

Your fine with the Castrol Scott if you don't skimp on the ratio ( oil to fuel )

Cheers,
Jay
Jay Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 08:00 PM   #5
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 670
what ratio would you use on a 92 XR2 turning 7000 rpm Jay???..i use the mercury oil
baj666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 09:37 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Burty's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Weston Super Mare
Occupation: Electrical Engineer

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Weston Super Mare
Posts: 6,351
Send a message via AIM to Burty
I think Jay will say 40:1 but lets wait and see
Burty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2009, 10:08 PM   #7
Trade Member
 
Country: United States
Location: South Texas. USA
Occupation: Own JSRE ( Jay Smith Racing Engines )
Interests: ACCELERATION (anykind )

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Texas. USA
Posts: 244
Burty wins the cigar. My suggestions are ANY 3 1/2" bore diameter engine ( 153 CI ) no matter what HP if the RPM is < 8000 or less I like 40:1 ... Any higher RPMS 32:1 ..

The smaller bored sized engines such as 120 CI and 142 CI 50: 1 is fine at
< 8000 RPMS and 40:1 > 8000 RPMS.....

Jay
Jay Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2009, 08:08 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Burty's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Weston Super Mare
Occupation: Electrical Engineer

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Weston Super Mare
Posts: 6,351
Send a message via AIM to Burty
And for all of us that don't live in the US i will translate.

Jay's suggestions are ANY 2.5 litre no matter what HP if the RPM is < 8000 or less I like 40:1 ... Any higher RPMS 32:1 ..

The smaller bored sized engines such as 2 litre and 2.4 litre 50: 1 is fine at
< 8000 RPMS and 40:1 > 8000 RPMS.....


So it looks like i don't get that cigar after all as an XR2 is a 2 litre motor
Burty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2009, 03:53 PM   #9
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 670
[QUOTE=Burty;173482]And for all of us that don't live in the US i will translate.

Jay's suggestions are ANY 2.5 litre no matter what HP if the RPM is < 8000 or less I like 40:1 ... Any higher RPMS 32:1 ..

The smaller bored sized engines such as 2 litre and 2.4 litre 50: 1 is fine at
< 8000 RPMS and 40:1 > 8000 RPMS.....


So it looks like i don't get that cigar after all as an XR2 is a 2 litre motor[/QUOTE]

no and correct
baj666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2009, 04:37 PM   #10
Dan
On a roll
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Country: England
Location: Plymouth
Occupation: Anything in metal
Interests: Bristol Rovers, Cider & Boats
Boat name: Aqua Thunder, Badboy
Boat make: Bernico F2, Phantom 21
Engines: Merc 280efi, Merc 260efi
Cruising area: Worldwide

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 2,249
So it looks like i don't get that cigar after all as an XR2 is a 2 litre motor[/QUOTE]

no and correct[/QUOTE]

stricksy, your my hero
__________________
All hail to Jail Ale
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2009, 01:25 AM   #11
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Smith View Post
Burty wins the cigar. My suggestions are ANY 3 1/2" bore diameter engine ( 153 CI ) no matter what HP if the RPM is < 8000 or less I like 40:1 ... Any higher RPMS 32:1 ..

The smaller bored sized engines such as 120 CI and 142 CI 50: 1 is fine at
< 8000 RPMS and 40:1 > 8000 RPMS.....

Jay
Just out of curiosity, how did some of the old Yamaha engines get away with 100:1 mixture ? Was it due to the design of the engine or were they not very highly stressed.

Regards David
PerformanceDodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2009, 06:53 PM   #12
Trade Member
 
Country: United States
Location: South Texas. USA
Occupation: Own JSRE ( Jay Smith Racing Engines )
Interests: ACCELERATION (anykind )

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Texas. USA
Posts: 244
Never heard of any oil that suggests 100:1 except Amzoil and I don't have any Lawn Mowers I'd run that in !!!

Ever thought that if the base oil stock had less solvent and was thicker the ratio would/could be greater ?

IMO: The smaller the bore the less oil the motor needs, also I find that engines with larger bores ( 3.500" ) required more oil in the ratio ( 40:1 to 32:1 ) the smaller the bore 2.4 the less oil is needed in the ratio 50:1 ...

DUUNO about Rice Motors ( Yamaha ) all I feel comfortable with is the Mercs I DO KNOW those what will and won't live.....

Have a great New Year !
Jay
Jay Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2009, 07:13 PM   #13
Registered User
 
scooby_hugh's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Guernsey
Occupation: Network Engineer
Boat make: Argo 21
Engines: 2.5 EFI
Cruising area: Channel Islands

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 426
iv only seen 100:1 on the old yamaha 2hp's all the others were 50:1 what year are you talking bout freddy?
scooby_hugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2009, 08:24 PM   #14
numbskull
 
Jon Fuller's Avatar
 
Country: United Kingdom
Location: South
Occupation: none
Interests: none
Boat name: Leviathan
Boat make: Phantom 28
Cruising area: South Coast

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South
Posts: 15,959
There were loads of Yamaha 100:1 engines, shed loads of different HP's. I had a 1987 15hp that was 100:1

Eric Smillie could could confirm what size they went up to. I would imagine, everything that didn't have autolube.

fairly sure my mates 85 was 100:1 too.
__________________
.

"I Agree with everything you say really!" - John Cooke to Jon Fuller - 26-01-2013
Jon Fuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2009, 09:16 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Mrs Smillie's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Bisley Woking
Occupation: Marine Engineer
Interests: Boats, skiing pets
Cruising area: wherever there is work!

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bisley Woking
Posts: 396
Hi John

From memory largest Yamaha with 100:1 was the 55 A or B
100:1 engines had a white ratio decal

60 C 60D (race engine) and all above including 85A where 50:1 red ratio decal

The factory had run engines as low a 500:1

Yours

Eric
Mrs Smillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2009, 08:02 AM   #16
BananaShark Member
 
Cookee's Avatar
 
Country: UK
Location: Salcombe South Devon
Occupation: Racer and builder
Interests: Winning races
Boat name: BananaShark
Boat make: BananaShark 34' Race
Engines: Twin Yanmar BY 260's

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Salcombe South Devon
Posts: 4,638
Castrol Biolube was allegedly a 100:1 oil - we were never brave enough to race with it at that ratio though!
__________________
Cookee



British Champions! RIB Formula 1 2005
National Speed Record Holder at 90.15 (still)

www.bananasharkracing.com
Cookee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2009, 08:13 AM   #17
numbskull
 
Jon Fuller's Avatar
 
Country: United Kingdom
Location: South
Occupation: none
Interests: none
Boat name: Leviathan
Boat make: Phantom 28
Cruising area: South Coast

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South
Posts: 15,959
Running different oil ratios isn't quite as simple as just changing the ratio.

Halving, or doubling the amount of oil for a given quantity of fuel also changes the viscosity of the final mix, and subsequently the jet size needed to maintain the same fuel metering. We've covered this before in a thread somewhere.
__________________
.

"I Agree with everything you say really!" - John Cooke to Jon Fuller - 26-01-2013
Jon Fuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-12-2009, 01:09 PM   #18
Trade Member
 
Country: United States
Location: South Texas. USA
Occupation: Own JSRE ( Jay Smith Racing Engines )
Interests: ACCELERATION (anykind )

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Texas. USA
Posts: 244
Jon is dead on correct,
When one doubles the oil ratio the specific gravity of the fuel is dramaticly changed ( INCREASED ) ... I always tell my customers I NEVER double oil when breaking in ! I explain it leans the engine, they say HUH ? I expain what goes through a funnel quicker syrup or water. By thickening up the oil ratio you have created syrup it now has MORE resistance getting through a metering orfice either an injector ( with the same fuel pressure driving it ) or a carb jet ! Some may argue this but I worked in the fuels division at EXXON for 35 years andknow fuel and their works, I have measured the specific gravity of fuels with different ratios of oil mixed , and proved my point, the higher the oil ratio becomes the heavier and more dense the fuel becomes thus the more resistant is is passing through the system with the same fuel pressure and duration time the injector is open thus the motor will run LEANER at any thing higher than what the factory suggest and the processor is designed for...I confirmed this and achieved these concrete numbers with a fuel hydrometer...

Cheers,
Jay
__________________

Jay Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
×